Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'extension'.
-
I am a developer and want to know about some best extensions that could help me in increasing my productivity as a developer.
- 1 reply
-
- development
- chrome
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I am going to create a Extension for internet explorer but i am not able to understand how to start creating Extension for internet explorer.
- 4 replies
-
- .net
- internet explore
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I'm trying to block some sites through WebRequest, but when the checkbox this false even still blocking the site, anyone can help, this is the code that I have Options.js Background.js He had seen this example LocalStorage, but not how to use it... Can someone explain how to do to return the value...
- 2 replies
-
- chrome.storage
- javascript
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hi to all, i hope to find some help here. This is my problem, which need urgent help. Im working on a chrome extension, VERY VERY basic. My extension block a list of "urls" so i have 2 files for my chrome extension, my manifest.json and background.js Code of manifest.json: {"name":"Stop-it","description":"app","version":"1.0,"manifest_version":2,"permissions": ["webRequest","webRequestBlocking","unlimitedStorage"],"icons":{"48":"icon.png"},"background":{"scripts": ["background.js"]},"browser_action":{"default_popup":"popup.html","default_icon":"icon.png"}} and the code of my background.js: chrome.webRequest.onBeforeRequest.addListener( function(details) {return {cancel: true};}, { urls:[ .url1, .url2, etc... ] },['blocking']); at the moment i store all the urls, inside the background.js, and thats the problem, because its a list of urls i update every week, and my urls list has 2 millions urls, so when i install my extension, and start browsing, chrome become really really slower. I really need help on this problem, the manifest.json, is perfect and work perfectly, the problem come from my background.js, how to store all those urls on the user computer, instead of the background.js, i add here a jpeg file who show the memory consumption in chrome. thanks to all
-
I'm doing some code generation, and for coding reasons, I want to derive from the same base type for all of my XSDs. So this works: <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" version="1.02"> <xs:include schemaLocation="MessageBase.xsd"/> <xs:element name="ServiceRequest" type="ServiceRequestType_VersionInfo_Request"/> <xs:complexType name="ServiceRequestType_VersionInfo_Request" mixed="true"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="MessageBase"> <!-- insert schema definition stuff here --> </xs:extension> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType></xs:schema> In another file, I have this: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- edited with XMLSPY v2004 rel. 3 U (http://www.xmlspy.com) by VeriFone, Inc. (VeriFone, Inc.) --><xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" version="2.5"> <xs:complexType name="MessageBase"/></xs:schema> But I need that first file in its own namespace. If i set a "targetNamespace" on the first file (to put it in its own namespace), then it complains it can't find the MessageBase complexType. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Any ideas?