Mad_Griffith

Hi I would like to mask `domain2.com/my-path/` with `domain2.com` (base URL).

I have done the following and it works:

    location = / {
        proxy_pass http://domain2.com/my-path/;
    }

But now I don't know how to bar the user from accessing `domain2.com/my-path/` directly or, from that address, redirect him to `domain2.com`, without influencing the solution above.

Also, I am not fully convinced of using the `proxy_pass` directive, as I am using uWSGI and could maybe use `uwsgi_pass`, but something like the following throws an `invalid host in upstream` error:

    location = / {
        uwsgi_param QUERY_STRING $query_string;
        uwsgi_param REQUEST_METHOD $request_method;
        uwsgi_param CONTENT_TYPE $content_type;
        uwsgi_param CONTENT_LENGTH $content_length;
        uwsgi_param REQUEST_URI $request_uri;
        uwsgi_param PATH_INFO $document_uri;
        uwsgi_param DOCUMENT_ROOT $document_root;
        uwsgi_param SERVER_PROTOCOL $server_protocol;
        uwsgi_param REMOTE_ADDR $remote_addr;
        uwsgi_param REMOTE_PORT $remote_port;
        uwsgi_param SERVER_ADDR $server_addr;
        uwsgi_param SERVER_PORT $server_port;
        uwsgi_param SERVER_NAME $server_name;
        uwsgi_pass http://domain2.com/my-path/;
    }

And also in this case:

module.exports = {
	get myProp() {
		mySubProp: {
                    return { ExternalModuleObject, } = require("./myexternalmodule")
                }
	},
	init: function() {
		myprop = new ...
	}
}

I have the following data:

module.exports = {
	get myProp() {
		return {
			ExternalModuleObject,
		} = require("./myexternalmodule")
	}
	init: function() {
		myprop = new ...
	}
}

How to correctly create an ExternalModuleObject's instance inside init()?

And I am also wondering why something like this is incorrect:

RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} my.website.com
RewriteRule ^(?:https\:\/\/)?\w*\.(.+) www.$1/my [P]

The pattern is syntactically correct.

"Example 2" on this page.

In my case, the server and domain name is always the same.

I have this rewrite rule

RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^DomainA.com
RewriteRule ^(.*) http://DomainB.com/PathToPageHere [P]

but it just acts as a normal redirect (the address changes).

Hi, I am trying to have my.website.tld redirect to www.website.tld/my. The constraints:

1) "my" is not a folder, but a Wordpress category with posts.

2) I would like to keep the url as "my.website.tld"

How can I accomplish that?

Thank you.

Thank you so much. I found this resource and I may need a mix of a Factory / FrontController kind of thing, although I am not too keen on abstracting the dispatcher. But the philosophy behind what I am trying to do quite matches the FrontController pattern.

10 hours ago, justsomeguy said:

And why are you doing that from the superclass and not the child class?

Because I want the Child class to be as clean as possible and somehow abstract that method's firing.

I need to fire the appropriate Child's method firing:

$moduleInstance->$method;

I am doing it because I would like to have an entry point Class to control all the routing. I would still need to have modules such as Site inherit methods and properties from a superclass, though.

This is a more faithful code. I need to instantiate Module only once because it can be extended for an indefinite number of times. I hope you can shed some light as I am currently stuck.

<?php

class Site extends Module {

    public function indexAction() {
        echo 'init\'ed!';
    }
}

class Module {
    public $name;

    public function getName() {
        return $this->name;
    }

    public function setName($name) {
        $this->name = $name;
    }

    public function getMethod() {
        return $this->method;
    }

    public function setMethod($method) {
        $this->method = $method;
    }

    public function init() {
        $this->setName('Site');
        $this->setMethod('indexAction');

        $moduleName = $this->getName();
        $methodName = $this->getMethod();

        $moduleInstance = new $moduleName();
        $moduleInstance->$methodName;
    }

    public function __construct() {
        $this->init();
    }
}

$Module = new Module();

Hi, I am stuck in a conundrum.

I have the following code:

class Dad {

	public function setup() {
		// sets object and local vars
	}

	public function init() {
		$sonInstance = new $sonName();
		$sonInstance->$methodName();
	}

	public function __construct($sonName = null, $methodName = null) {
		$this->setup($moduleName, $methodName);
	}

}

class Son extends Dad {

	public function doSomething() {

	}

}

All this complication is needed because I need to have Dad() flexible enough to call Son() dynamically and be also able to inject the Son's class and method directly (please note that I omitted all the getters and setters on purpose from the code above).

$Dad = new Dad();
$Dad->init();

$Son = new Dad('Son', 'doSomething');
$Son->init();

And I need Son extending Dad so that I can access Dad's methods within Son.

But doing all this also makes Dad->setup() be called twice. How can I avoid this? What pattern suggestions do you have?

Thank you.

I just noticed I am in a conundrum. in firstMethod() I am also setting the value of a few SecondClass' variables that I want to be accessible in ThirdClass, but which of course is not set in ThirdClass if I either add the check in the SecondClass' constructor or override the constructor in ThirdClas. How do I overcome that?

Thank you.

uhm, I get your points. What do you think of this solution? firstMethod() is actually just a init function containing stuff that SecondClass won't share with any other class.

    public function __construct()
    {
        if (get_class($this) !== 'SecondClass') return;

        $this->firstMethod();
    }

ThirdClass is something I would like to keep clean, if possible. I will put a check on the class in SecondClass' constructor.

Anyway, thank you, I didn't know constructors are inherited.

You're right, that's the issue. How can I avoid this in such a way that I am not forced to put an empty constructor in ThirdClass? Should I just use a check on the class in the SecondClass' constructor or is there a better solution? 

It's the bare bone of my code and all I am getting is what appears to be an infinite loop. 

Hi, I can't understand what I am doing wrong. It keeps on loading endlessly. Can you help out?

I have one file with this:

require_once 'path/to/firstclass';

$Core = new FirstClass();

Then in second file I have this:

require_once 'SecondClass.php';

class FirstClass {

public function __construct() {
	$SecondClass = new SecondClass();
}

}

In a third file I have this:

class SecondClass {

public function __construct() {
	require_once 'path/to/thirdclass';

	$ThirdClass = new ThirdClass();
	$ThirdClass->secondMethod();
}

public function firstMethod() {
	echo 'my first method!';
}

}

And in a fourth file I have this:

class ThirdClass extends SecondClass {

public function secondMethod() {
	$this->firstMethod();
}

}

Thank you.

my bad, the initializations were in a different function (though I had omitted "var" and therefore thought they were global). I moved them out in the global scope.

Hi, thank you. Unfortunately I am getting "ImagesLoaded is not defined" (within handleImages())

Like this?

var complete = 0
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
  $.post().then(handleResponse);
}

function handleResponse() {
  complete++;

  var images = { 'title1' : 'http://url-to-img-1', 'title2' : 'http://url-to-img-2', 'title3' : 'http://url-to-img-3' };

  var imagesAmount = Object.keys(images).length,
  imagesLoaded = 0;
  
  for (var img in images) {
    var imgObj = new Image();
    imgObj.src = images[img];
    imgObj.onload = function() { 
        imagesLoaded++
    };
  }

  if(complete === arr.length && imagesLoaded === imagesAmount - 1) {
    // Do something
  }
}

Thanks! Picking up on your solution: what if I have 3 post requests and I have to load 3 images per request and I want to be sure that the "Do something" part is reached only when the last request's last image is loaded?

Would the following be correct?

var complete = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
  $.post().then(handleResponse);
}

function handleResponse() {
  complete++;

  var images = { 'title1' : 'http://url-to-img-1', 'title2' : 'http://url-to-img-2', 'title3' : 'http://url-to-img-3' };

  var imagesAmount = Object.keys(images).length;
  
  for (var img in images) {
    var imgObj = new Image();
    imgObj.src = images[img];
    img.onload = imagesLoaded++;
  }

  if(complete === arr.length && imagesLoaded === imagesAmount - 1) {
    // Do something
  }
}

Thanks

Hi, I am trying to figure out how to execute a function at the end of the loop and after all the post requests have ended. Can anyone help, please?

for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {

  $.post().then(function() {
                               
    //some code

  });
                               
  if(isLastIteration) {

    func();

  }

}

Thank you!

Hi! I am starting to write my own MVC CMS just to learn about classes.

One thing I do not understand is what is how in the MVC pattern a new class instance is generated in the controller and used in the view. Could you make an example with a Page class that would generate each page's body inside a static index.php?

I'd just need a general example so that I can understand how to use instantiation properly in the context of page layouts and MVC.

Thank you.