Sarah.Crocker.10

Found the answer: <xsl:value-of select="count(distinct-values(wd:Report_Data/wd:Report_Entry/wd:field)"/>

Here is my xml: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><wd:Report_Data xmlns:wd="urn:com.workday.report/CR-INT034-ADP-Garnishment_Disbursements_File-Outbound2"> <wd:Report_Entry> <wd:field>1111</wd:field> </wd:Report_Entry> <wd:Report_Entry> <wd:field>2222</wd:field> </wd:Report_Entry> <wd:Report_Entry> <wd:field>3333</wd:field> </wd:Report_Entry> <wd:Report_Entry> <wd:field>2222</wd:field> </wd:Report_Entry> <wd:Report_Entry> <wd:field>3333</wd:field> </wd:Report_Entry> <wd:Report_Entry> <wd:field>1111</wd:field> </wd:Report_Entry></wd:Report_Data> Here is the xslt I am using: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xsl:stylesheet xmlns:wd="urn:com.workday.report/CR-INT034-ADP-Garnishment_Disbursements_File-Outbound2" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"version="2.0"><xsl:strip-space elements="*"/><xsl:output indent="no" method="text" /> <xsl:key name="entry" match="wd:Report_Entry" use="wd:field" /> <xsl:template match="wd:Report_Data"> <xsl:value-of select="count(wd:Report_Entry | wd:field[ generate-id() = generate-id(key('entry', wd:field))])"/> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> I am trying to count the unique values. So in the example above, the answer should be 3 and I am getting 6. I can get this to work in 1.0 with the following code: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xsl:stylesheet xmlns:wd="urn:com.workday.report/CR-INT034-ADP-Garnishment_Disbursements_File-Outbound2" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"version="1.0"><xsl:strip-space elements="*"/><xsl:output indent="no" method="text" /> <xsl:key name="entry" match="wd:Report_Entry" use="wd:field" /> <xsl:template match="wd:Report_Data"> <xsl:value-of select="count(wd:Report_Entry [ generate-id() = generate-id(key('entry', wd:field))])"/> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> But I can't use 1.0 I have to use 2.0. Is there any way to get this to work in 2.0 or am I just out of luck? Any help would greatly be appreciated! Thanks,Sarah