Jonas

Actually, they are centered with text-align: center; on the parent element for browsers IE LTE 6 (don't know about IE 7). Opera, Firefox and Safari on the other hand support the correct margin: 0 auto;

Really.<tagger>content</tagger><p_class="a">content</p>Counting the space, that's ten potentially superfluous bytes when using tagger, just like when using p. And you can make your pages search engine-, and thus user-, friendly.And your signature makes no sense: If you started making websites in 1999, XHTML wasn't even a standard or recommendation back then. XHTML 1.0 was announced a recommendation on January 26 2000.http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xhtml1-20000126/Of course, no one can force you. It really just comes down to whether or not you want to keep up with the times and help the web grow to its full potential.

I fail to see the connection. No flaming please.

Apologies, but I believe the reason that topic wasn't pinned (made important, stickied) is that it was expected to hold its own in popularity and stay on the first page. Apparently not. I'll pin it then.For future reference, search is your friend...

For now there's this anyway:http://w3schools.invisionzone.com/index.ph...c=3074&st=0

Thanks, worked it out.

Well, there's a lot that can be done with Apache SSI, so in that case perhaps a tutorial could be run on running an own server and tweaking it.As for CGI, that really isn't one language. CGI, Common Gateway Interface, isn't a language, but a protocol. To write CGI scripts, you can use many different languages.

Um, okay, so I'm experiencing something weird with Opera. My adress bar disappeared. I mean, I still have the navigation buttons (back, next, update, magic wand) and the search dropdown bar, but the main adress field is gone, and I can't seem to get it back. Anyone able to help? I tried downloading and upgrading Opera (no new version, just installing over the old), and that didn't help either. I really don't want to have to uninstall and install Opera, because I have many icons on my personal toolbar that I don't want to lose. :|

Good summary.

That sentence is extremely arrogant, and it reminds me of someone... I'll leave that sentence hanging for those who catch on. Whose favourite now?! Where the ###### did you get the impression we like Micro$oft? Standards for programming languages is a whole nother chapter than structure languages like html. No one here could care less what programming language you use, as long as it outputs correct html and css. It's standards for those languages we're pushing, because that's what matters in a browser*, everything else is for the server to support, and the end-user/client doesn't see that anyway as long as it works and doesn't produce errors. You could make your own language to output html and css, as long as you've also developed a program to parse the code. In fact, that's precisely what Rasmus Lerdorf did in 1994 when he invented what was to be called PHP (originally Personal Home Page Tools, and later, of course, PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor).*Of course other things matter in a browser, like security etc., but strictly speaking for when developing for the net, it's standards for client-side languages that is important.

Well, there it is really. If you know little about standards, and admit to it, perhaps you should not start developing a browser, not knowing the basic cornerstones of the net (the languages html and css and the respective standards of them trying to be established by the W3C. You're on a forum of webdesigners/developers/programmers who are pretty much all frustrated by the fact that they have to use extra hours (and, if a job, clients' money) to develop a site that looks the same in all browsers to ensure the end-user (or client, but with another meaning than the last instance of the word) gets the same result no-matter the browser they want to use. That's the WHOLE point of standards, setting a base of rules for what is valid html/css code, and how a browser is supposed to render these things. Even today, Internet Explorer doesn't have support for all of the CSS 2 Spesification, and hardly any support for anything of CSS 3. It's horrible really, and requires coding sites with little "hacks" (work-arounds) and quirks. A forum like this, with people defending and demanding standards die-hard, it may not be the best place to advertize your browser with hope of success. I think you may already be stoned.No pun intended I guess? Or was that all about the double-entendre? Actually, if the only reason you came here was to advertize your browser, you came here for all the wrong reasons. Of course, this is a place to get good constructive criticism, but if you don't care what people tell you and just maintain that your browser is the best anyway, it's just advertizing and border-line spam.

Ok, I'm going to lock this thread, since kaijim has already made a reply to the other thread linked to in Justsomeguy's post (follow the report link).

Wouldn't call it criticism, more a suggestion. Your link on the CSS Valid icon could be changed to http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/refererThat will take the user straight to the validation results.

I notice there's a comment in kaijim's profile as well:http://w3schools.invisionzone.com/index.php?showuser=2Same problem probably... :)Oh, and there was a problem with w3schools last february as well. Took me some time to dig up the thread, but here it is:http://w3schools.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=2386It was IE-only back then as well.I've notified kaijim of this. Thanks for letting us know.

Nice example and view into your browsing habits...

Hmm, that's weird. Don't know what would cause that...Anyone else with IE7 experiencing this?

Hmm, so this happens in Firefox, does it? Have you signed in to the forum other places in between your visits here? Because I believe the forum software also does a browser check, so that one cookie session also includes info on the browser. If you've signed in for example at school, with a different version of firefox or perhaps IE then that could account for why your session is ended at home as it were.

Well, when it kinda grows we'll see again if the xml forum gets enough SVG threads that a separate forum might be justified. :)On XSLT having its own forum though, that's a bit different, seeing as XSLT is made to manipulate other XML documents. I'm sure boen_robot can tell you more.

Do you feel such a forum is badly needed?

SVG is an xml-based language, is it not?

Lots of recommended hosts here:http://w3schools.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=3770Please continue in that thread.

If you set the table cell with a fixed width and height, set overflow to auto and make sure the content overflows that fixed height and/or width, then yes. Actually, you won't get a horizontal scrollbar unless you spesifically code your content to stop the automatic linebreak that overflow:auto; does, by using and such.

Overflow: scroll; adds a vertical and a horizontal scrollbar, and even if the content doesn't overflow, you still get the inactive scrollbars displayed. I at least much prefer to use auto, so that it only gives you a scrollbar for overflowing content.

You can read through here and see if you find someone. We can't have threads for everyone wondering where people are from, that would amount to a lot of threads very soon, sorry.