Jonas

Call it whatever you will, it is a space between the two paragraphs. However, the way to affect it with CSS is to set the margin of the p element.

It's not to do with the fact that it is a block element, but that it has auto set margins. The point of a paragraph is to stand alone, isn't it? So if you have several paragraphs, they are actually made to look like paragraphs without you having to use line breaks to achieve the wanted margin/space between the paragraphs. To remove the margins, the correct way is to set the margins to be the same in all browsers, using the method jilhaslip did.

Word talked about I'm guessing is ######, but you're not allowed to say that, because it can be put into, well, creative sentences along with other words you're not allowed to say as well...Now, I think this topic has gone on long enough. Now it's gone off-topic from the topic that was already off-topic, so I think we'll say stop here.

We haven't paid anything. Nor have we been paid anything for that matter. :)My point in the end is, we're volunteer moderators. We don't have database access. As for kaijim, he may have, since it's their (w3schools.com) forum, not ours.

We don't need a new thread every time a browser comes in a new version, thank you.This will suffice:http://w3schools.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=8655

The approach in number 4 is correct, yeah. No mystery about that.

No, I said what justsomeguy said, no pain, no gain.

http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/ So you can't expect XHTML 2.0 anytime soon. Anyway, going off topic, let's try not to do that. Prateek, this is your topic, you do the honours, no particular reason for us to do it. In fact, the flow of this thread shouldn't have to be dependant of one of us checking continually to see if a question has to be posted.

Assuming we're talking current standards, number two. However, for xhtml 2.0, h1 is deprecated, in which case I'd go for number one.

Me too. Link explaining?EDIT: Ah, never mind, I googled it a bit. Sure, looks ok. Fire away.

It's basically no pain, no gain. Or, if you will, the opposite of "aim low, and you won't be disappointed".

You could still use CSS for the formatting info, for example: table { width: 800px; height: 600px; border: 1px solid #000; }td { width: 800px;height: 300px;border: 0;background: #efefef;} <table><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr></table> It should load a bit quicker than using html attributes for the table.

Yeah, I realised I worded myself a bit ambiguously at first...

Feel it out. How is the tone between you? Do you get on well? It's always nice to be told that someone likes you and find you attractive. It's very difficult to go wrong.

Np

Media and communication. :)Too explain a bit better though, when we enter high school (well, we don't have high schools really, but our equivalents anyway, aged between 16/17 and 18/19), we can apply to various lines. "Media and Communication" is an example of such a line. Schools of this line offer special subjects such as photography and image editing, video/filmproduction, information and communications technology, ++. In addition to fun subjects like that though, you also get what we call General Study Competence, meaning you are required to have had a minimum hours per week of certain subjects, such as Norwegian, Maths, English, and some more that I can't think of now. If you don't know any spesific direction you're taking when applying to high school (or, again, our equivalent), it's normal to take All-round Education (which is what I did).

Oh yeah, I've had girls fawn over my coding skills. Happens every day.

Her? vI don't think that's the girl he's talking about though, I think that's a standard image with the premade design. But I agree with skemcin, from experience myself. Tell her face-to-face, and don't wait. If you wait, you may find she has had feelings for you in the time you didn't tell her, but the feelings have since passed. Then you'll kick yourself real good. Like me.

LOL. Expressing your love for someone on a web development forum can be taken as a bit geeky by a girl, I think...

There's no such thing as 100% secure. You can possibly, but not probably, be 100% prepared though, meaning you have taken all the precautions you can, both securing the server and the pages themselves against attacks.

Alone it does nothing, but it can be used for queries in URLs, that is to pass certain variables to the page you're requesting. For example, this thread comes from the same page as all the others, that is index.php, but giving the page a certain value for the variable showtopic makes the index.php page request spesific database info to get this exact page. For more than one query, you use ampersands (&), such as index.php?userID=1&pageID=3 (just an example).

I have it saved on my home computer, so it'll be back when I am. I didn't want a lengthy signature really...

I notice if you check/validate for css 3 spesification, then it's only the filter thing that's not valid:http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validat...=1&profile=css3Is filter: alpha(opacity=100); still necessary to use for IE?

Um, I don't think the HR element is deprecated. From what I can see in the link jilhaslip provided, it's just the attributes that are deprecated in xhtml 1.0. HOWEVER, in the XHTML 2.0 spesification, the "hr" element will be replaced by the "separator" element. Also, "br" will be replaced by "l".http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/introduction.h...tro_differences

I can't do it right now when in York, but when I get back on the 17th, I can help as well. Ask me any questions on html -> xhtml/css convertions, or send me an html file, and I'll gladly update it free of charge. Some of the most difficult stuff with tables is removing attributes like margin="", valign="", cellpadding="" and cellspacing="", because the equivalent css attributes are totally different. My process of changing html files to xhtml/css involves first making a copy of the file so I can go back to the start, and then I'll start with all the easy attributes to css convertions. Then, when all of that is out of the way, you do one difficult conversion at a time.