croatiankid
-
Posts
332 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by croatiankid
-
I don't know. Why don't you try it and see?
-
This is much better IMO. Do the "power search" and you can specify everything you could need and get results
-
<script type="text/javascript" src="link.js"></script> in html<script type="text/javascript" src="link.js" /> works in xhtml
-
css 4 isn't even a concept at this point. css 3 is the latest working draft. see here
-
<script type="text/javascript" src="urltoscript.js"></script> for html<script type="text/javascript" src="urltoscript.js" /> works in xhtml.
-
Prateek's code was slightly incorrect. change "align" to "text-align".Here is a fully w3c valid html 4.01 strict document <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"><title>Page title here</title><style type="text/css">p.center{text-align:center;}</style><p class="center"><a href="whatever_you_want_to_link_to.ext"><img src="image1" alt="alternative text"></a><a href="whatever_you_want_to_link_to.ext"><img src="image2" alt="alternative text"></a><a href="whatever_you_want_to_link_to.ext"><img src="image3" alt="alternative text"></a><a href="whatever_you_want_to_link_to.ext"><img src="image4" alt="alternative text"></a></p>
-
no not semantically for now, you'll have to wait several more years unfortunately.however you should check out this article titled CSS Design: Creating Custom Corners & Borders. alistapart's got some really useful articles
-
you can layer GIFs so you have much more than 256 colors, of which any number of them can be transparent.
-
absolutely nothing because only ie takes note of it. like any other meta tag - no side effects. content is the value of the meta tag. just like <meta name="keywords" content="keyword1, keyword2, keyword3" />
-
relative is relative to where the element would normally appear, if positioning were not used. for example if you give something position:relative;left:5px;, it will appear 5 px to the right of where it would normally appear
-
img is inline by default, inline elements are centered via text align.for the purpose you're most likely using it,img{display:block;margin:0 auto;} should do it. depending on your doctype, add "text-align:center;"
-
-
actually if you have PHP or any server scripting language installed, you CAN make use of it (on your own computer). however know, that you can't actually have a file with that kind of name in windows. you can declare a variable with it (eg x=5), and if you have a conditional or switch in the php file, it can do something with that.
-
use the DOM?
-
are you sure it doesn't add a line break? i didn't test it, i just thought it does (I'm sure headings and divs add line breaks)
-
How in the world are we supposed to help you if you won't help us?
-
Unfortunately this means your page is coded in a way that it relies on browsers to be in quirks mode. http://hsivonen.iki.fi/doctype/ is a useful table where you can see which doctypes activate which rendering mode in many browsers. You'll get the same effect using <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN"> and no doctype.
-
TR styling doesn't work in IE
-
Show us you're code. We are NOT psychic.
-
I always use a full absolute URL doctype so browsers are in standards mode and I don't have to worry about quirks.
-
put padding:0 for it too, since opera adds padding to BODY
-
no, inline elements are elements such as SPAN IMG B I EM STRONG etc.block elements are ones like P DIV etc. search the web for inline and block elements in html.
-
<meta http-equiv="imagetoolbar" content="no" />
-
Since P is a block level element it displays as most block elements do: with a line break before and (sometimes) after. try p{display:inline} to get rid of the line break.
-
I don't think I'd charge more than $400 for that, especially because (I think) it doesn't look right in firefox. But then again it does have flash; since I don't know flash I'd outsource it for most likely under $50.Not to mention using tables for layout, causing each page to load at least twice as much as it should.