Jump to content

Thelenius

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Thelenius's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/7)

0

Reputation

  1. Oops, I didn't notice it before but you're right about the menu widths, they're indeed different. Firefox has consistent menu widths (about 160px) throughout the pages, whereas Safari has really wide menus on the dictionary page and narrower than FF (about 125px) on all the others. So go through all the details where the dictionary differs from the others and you'll find the culprit. My bet is not on the javascript, but then again, what do I know about javascript. Well, in Firefox the vertical space for the header texts is a bit cramped above the text, the tops of the characters almost touch the upper line of the h1/h2 element. In Safari, the space above the characters is the same as below them and the text has room to breathe nicely.Always glad to help another roleplayer - too bad I couldn't help more than this.
  2. I was going through sites that have global browser statistics and noticed that the W3Schools statistics don't have Safari listed, nor could I actually find any mention of Safari anywhere in the browser info texts (or whatever).This is strange, since according to other statistics sites, Safari is currently the third most popular browser. So what's up? It should be at the very least mentioned in the section about different browsers, which has info on all kinds of obscure browsers.
  3. Well, it's hard for me to say what the page should look like (I assume you've optimized it for IE, but I didn't want to go to the trouble of firing up my PC), but here's a screenshot of how it appears in my Safari 2.0.4, with one of the expandables open (not that it made any difference, actually).In my Firefox 1.5.0.4 the same page looks like this. As you can see, it looks the same, except for the screwed up header heights that appear in Firefox. In both browsers, opening and closing the expandables works just fine and I can't see any glitches.Sadly, this is all I have to offer, as I don't have time for an analysis (and I'm no expert anyway). Maybe drop the tables and go with a CSS layout? The html looks pretty heavy-handed to me at a quick glance.Safari is a very standards-compliant browser, so as long as you code according to the standards, there really should be very little trouble.(Sorry for the big file sizes in the screenshots, I didn't bother to edit them in any way.)(BTW, the screenshots are in my domain's temp folder and will be deleted sooner or later.)
×
×
  • Create New...