Guest benriddell Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 Hi,I tried and tried and tried to find contact information, but only found the forum.I'm disappointed in the PHP tutorial:http://www.w3schools.com/PHP/php_get.aspIt's defining $_GET as a *function*. It's not. It's an array.http://us2.php.net/manual/en/reserved.variables.get.phpThere's no publication date on the page, so no way to know how long it's been there.The footer says "We do not warrant the correctness of its content." But that's a huuuuge cop-out for an error as basic and egregious as this. Lots of newbies come to this site to learn, but if they learn that $_GET is a function, they're going to be confused little coders (and might not even be aware of the extent to which they are confused...).I am not a crank. Well, not normally. But I'm annoyed that there is no other way to contact the site owners.-Ben Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justsomeguy Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 They do list an email address to contact with corrections somewhere on one of the About Us pages. That's obviously a problem in the tutorial though, it's borderline misleading. It describes $_GET as a built-in function. Print_r is a built-in function, $_GET is a superglobal array. This is an interesting line also: The "welcome.php" file can now use the $_GET function to collect form data (the names of the form fields will automatically be the keys in the $_GET array):They do the same thing on the $_POST page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffman Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Wow. We've had quibbles in the past, but this is the first real goof I remember that was quite so bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justsomeguy Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Yeah, that looks pretty amateurish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.