Jump to content

element "font" undefined?


Robai

Recommended Posts

Please explain why this does not validate.This is my test.htm file:

<!DOCTYPE htmlPUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/><title>Some title</title></head><body><p><font>some text</font></p></body></html>

Trying to validate it herehttp://validator.w3.org/Validation result is this:

 Line 13, Column 9: element "font" undefined <p><font>some text</font></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please explain why this does not validate.This is my test.htm file:
<!DOCTYPE htmlPUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/><title>Some title</title></head><body><p><font>some text</font></p></body></html>

Trying to validate it herehttp://validator.w3.org/Validation result is this:

 Line 13, Column 9: element "font" undefined <p><font>some text</font></p>

also <p style="font-size: 1em">text</p> instead of font-size you can set the attribute you need. The attibutes "translated" into css can be found here, for example: http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_font.aspciaoGabriele
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you!I've looked herehttp://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_font.aspand found there that attributes of <font> tag are deprecated, but I didn't noticed that the tag <font> itself is deprecated too.LOL :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious why Dreamweaver 8 added <font> tag when I selected text "some text" here

<p>some text</p>

and then I clicked on Font Tag Editor button (it is on Text palette) and picked color red, which gave this result:

<p><font color="#FF0000">some text</font></p>

Why on the heavens it added <font> tag when it is deprecated (and doctype is strict)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whose to say that dreamweaver conforms to the standards? From what I've gathered and many here will point out, dreamweaver should not necessarily be relied on for producing semantic, valid markup. It's best to be used as an editor with some handy features, rather than a drag and drop editor. You're better of learning the syntax anyway and the standards yourself, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...