Using the reduce() Function as a Frequency Counter

Recommended Posts

BACKGROUND:  Recently I discovered a nifty Javascript function that counts the like values of an index array and returns as its value an object whose property-value pairs consist of a single repeated value and its corresponding frequency.  Unfortunately, I am having trouble understanding how the function works.  As I have adapted it to fit my own needs I have changed the variable names.  Indeed, this change may be the source of my own confusion.

The FUNCTION:

```function dateCounter(dates) {
return dates.reduce(
(countDates, date) => {
countDates[date] = ++countDates[date] || 1;
return countDates;
},
{}
);
}```

REQUEST:  Please write in plain English what the so-called reducer function of the reduce( ) function is achieving with each iteration.  I am baffled.

Roddy

Share on other sites

It will return an array of the frequency of dates.  The line that sets countDates[date] is equivalent to this:

```if (countDate[dates]) {
countDate[dates] = countDate[dates] + 1;
}
else {
countDate[dates] = 1;
}```

Share on other sites

OK.  you have adequately explained the following line of code.

`countDates[date] = ++countDates[date] || 1;`

Can you now explain this line of code.

`(countDates, date) => {...; return countDates;},{})`

The result set, by the way, appears to be an object of name-value pairs which is exactly what I was hoping for when I introduced the function into my code.

`Object { 2019/01/01: 2, 2019/01/03: 4, 2019/01/04: 2, 2019/01/05: 2, 2019/01/06: 1, 2019/01/07: 2, 2019/01/09: 6, 2019/01/11: 1, 2019/01/18: 3, 2019/01/20: 2, 60 more… }`

Roddy

Share on other sites

That's just a alternative way of defining a function in EcmaScript 6.  It's saying the function accepts 2 parameters, countDates and date, and then has the statements where it builds and then returns the array.

The empty object is the initial value to use for the accumulator for reduce.

Share on other sites

So, why is it that the dateCounter() function only returns one name-value pair in a single object, if the initial empty object is left out?  The empty object appears to induce recursion, but I do not understand why.

Roddy

Edited by iwato

Share on other sites

It's just the initial value.  If you don't start off with an initial value then you make a new object every time and return it.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.