Jump to content

sly_foxx68

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sly_foxx68

  1. layer? If you're refering to <layer> then you should start using <iframe> instead. <layer> isn't W3C compliant. And, if I'm right about that first part... then here's the answer to your question!
    <iframe name="myLayer" src="index.htm"></iframe><br><br><a href="blah.htm" target="myLayer">Click</a> to change the page shown in the iframe.

    I am actually refering to <div>. I am trying to get a page to load into a <div> when I click on one of my NAV buttons. I am still new here :-) ME=NOOBBrian
  2. Hi all, Not sure if this is the right place to post but I am gonna give it a shot since I am dealing with a layer.I want to have a page load into a layer. The layer is 650px X 658px. I would like it when someone clicks on a link on my page that the page will load in the layer. Again not sure if this is the right place but I have been looking for days now :-)Thanks All Brian

  3. I was having the same issue and I sued the following style definition and it fixed everything.div{-moz-box-sizing:border-box;box-sizing:border-box;margin:0;padding:0;}

  4. Hi again everyone! Quick question for you all please, atleast I hope it will be quick! What I would like to do is use an image in a style definition. I am going to be using this image many times through out my site and it would be great if I could make it part of a layer or div that I could call when needed. Thanks again everyone.

  5. Hi Brian,I haven't spent much time looking at this to be honest, but if I remember correctly, IE builds the border outside of the dimensions and Firefox, opera, etc. is the opposite.That means that a 100px X 100px DIV with a 2 px border is actually 104px x 104px with the border for one while the other remains 100 x 100 and the border is included in that dimesion.I might have that backwards, but you have the idea.  I've faced and solved this problem before (can't seem to remember how though at the moment) .  I'll post something if it comes to me.Something that might help would be to declare the style type for the page if you need to use the "style" attribute instead of all classes.<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css">You've already declared the styles with in your <style> tag as "text/css" but not the styles in your <div>'s.A lot of cross compatibility issues I've facesed with CSS are cleared up by declaring the style type.Hope this helps (sorry if i rambled)CheersAndrew

    Hi Andrew and thanks for he response. I have tried some of your suggestions and have had not luck sorry to say. I have shortened the code so it is easier to read but I am still gettting the 2 px overage on firefox and not with IE. I am assuming it is FF thats adds the px's to the "OUTSIDE" of the layer. Why is it that there is no standard for something like this. Something everyone uses, you would think the browser companies would call each other and sync up! If there is anyone out there that can shed some light, thanks in advnace.BrianEdit @ 10:57 AM....Funny too, I just had the W3C CSS vaildate all the code on the site :) and I am still getting the same issue. http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
  6. http://home.comcast.net/~jackfox68/Hello everyone Brian here and I am new to the forum and relativley new to HTML and coding. How is everyone doing? I would appreciate it if anyone has the time if you could look at the above website in Fire Fox and IE (6) and tell me why the <div>'s appear to be in different locations from browset to browser. Created with FP 2003. I am baffled $#%#$ :):) Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Kindly Brian P.
×
×
  • Create New...