mors
-
Posts
2 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by mors
-
-
Hi, I've started browsing the SVG pages, and I found a very unaccurate information.http://www.w3schools.com/svg/svg_intro.asp
Well... this isn't true. Currently Firefox only has partial support for SVG Full. Making such a claim will mistake users that will think they're doing wrong SVG, when they're actually trying to use something Firefox doesn't support.http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/SVG_in_Firefox_1.5I've read that the next major Gecko update is schedulled for beginnings of 2007 (I think), which probably will fill these gaps.It would be nice to emphasize that Opera 8.* has full support for SVG Tiny, and the upcoming Opera 9 has support for SVG Basic, in that very same page.I prefered Opera's approach of implementing SVG incrementaly, thus sparing the user of annoyances like mangling the specification and the browser documentation.edit: another thing I foundhttp://www.w3schools.com/svg/svg_inhtml.aspNote: Firefox 1.5 has full support for SVG! If you are using this browser, you do not need to install an SVG viewer.
Where I come from, data is placed in document using the object element. I found it very bad, for a website that tries to advocate w3c recomendations to present something like this. Yes, I saw object afterwards.<embed src="rect.svg" width="300" height="100" type="image/svg+xml"pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/svg/viewer/install/" />
Fix ajax example
in Suggestions
Posted
Incrible ! May I suggets you drop w3 from your website name ??Not only you example fails in Opera, it fails in all browser that aren't IE nor Mozilla. That includes Safari.This, and the old svg+embed code really show that this website content needs some serious improvement.