The Praetorian Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 So, as far as local links are concerned, is there any difference between these two ways of doing it? Is one right and one wrong? Or does it not matter?./folder/folder2/file.jpg/folder/folder2/file.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skym Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 They are different../folder/folder2/file.jpg points to a folder relative to the currect folder,/folder/folder2/file.jpg is relative to the web server root folder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boen_robot Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 The two examples you gave are different. Skym showed you why. But ./folder/folder2/file.jpg and folder/folder2/file.jpg are equivalent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now