Err

You're suppose to paste the code into the address bar on your browser once you do a search, not on the actual web page. Be sure to remove the space in java script. Then hit go/enter.

That might be possible through JavaScript. Flash I believe can do that pretty well also. I would suggest you to do some searching for either of those 2 methods.

Well, i dont have to guess. they became extinct during the flood. they were too big to into the ark.

I'm pretty sure that someone here, though I can't remember their username, changed their username. They said all they did was ask the admin.

No, it doesn't really matter if I said it or not, I knew this fact already but the reader didn't. It was important for me to mention it because it provides contrast to readers who think that the argument is biased, vis-à-vis very religious. Also thanks for your input.

I think it would be good to keep in mind that "religious" does not necessariy mean Christian (or even Judeo-Christian-Islamic). It is the Western religions that place emphasis on human ownership of and separation from nature. Other religious traditions do not see it this way.

I apologize, that wasn't my intended way to ask that question. I meant it in a way that asks "what about evolution then?".Anyways, I'm not saying we are not a part of evolution or that we are (Who's Cromagnum-man anyways?). Yes, either way you look at it, we can't exist if we didn't come from somewhere. It's odd though, humans give so little back to our environment, we constantly destroy things around us; people, ozone, animals, etc, and we give so little back. It's not surprising that some people think we are not part of nature, which is balanced, like aspnetguy mentioned earlier.I once asked a very religious person that question, he thought about it for a minute, then responded: "Well, I guess you can say we are not a part of nature. God put us here to enjoy life and benefit from it." And I didn't sway his thoughts after I asked him. My mom who is also very religious, picked the anti-evolution side of her interpretation of the question and also said we are not part nature. You know, it's very interesting getting input from different people.

No, there is no limit. You're not really nesting them... well they are nested but the inline style you added to the nested <div> is absolute which means it can move anywhere on the page regardless if it is nested or not. Lose the position:absolute; and left:204px; on the nested <div>. After that you can adjust the nested <div> anywhere inside the parent <div> with a little css.

I think people are a part of nature. Look at the opposite, what is "not natural"? Is it artificial? I can't see how we would be artificial, so we must be natural (with the exception of Michael Jackson, who is most certainly nota part of nature).

lol. I used to use that, until I found out that it doesn't work on all the browsers, which is probably what you're talking about. Just use the regular quotation marks or the html element ", it does the same thing.

Good point. Consider this: We breathe, communicate, reproduce, eat, need all the necessities of day and night, we have brains, muscles, bones, just like any animal (most of them anyways) that is a part of nature, only difference is that we have a superior brain and body structured just right which enables us to do a lot more. Heck even the skies and ground are a part of nature. If we are not a part of nature than what are we? Even if someone does say "God", if you read the bible it states: "From dust you are, and to dust you will return" touché?I'm not trying to prove anyone wrong or right. I'm just trying to have an intelligent unbiased discussion that looks at all sides.

Are humans a part of nature?You can interpret the question anyway you want. I asked several people and depending on who I ask, either a religious person or just a regular 'ol Joe, what they say is similar but they have a different way of interpreting the question. So I'm here asking people from around the world. What do you think?P.S. Don't base your opinions on the comments of other people who posted already, I want to know what you truly believe.

For your second error, add action="" to your form. That should be one less error. The first error like aspnetguy mentioned has to do with your DTD. You can try to change to a transitional DTD instead, like this one for example:

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

Links:http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_form.asp (<form>)http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_doctype.asp (DTD)

Kay, well I don't care either.

Neat. Thanks for sharing.

You're using the <object> tag to call for your headers/footers, I guess IE doesn't support it at that level. Have you tried replacing it with php Include?

Jesus Christ! I was instantly turned away from the site as soon as the loud music that startled me started blaring. I especially don't want to hear it when I'm listening to my own music that's for sure.

Try this: Float all your 3 columns to the left, with the exception of your header and footer of course. You might want to use pixels (px) instead of percentages for your width's also; it can throw any css layout into constant chaos.

Edit: I retract my statement.

If you write it in English then it will appear in English. However, if they use some third party translator, like Google for example, then it will appear in the language they choose.

Or you talking about the text only or the html that you want in Japanese?HTML is only in English, as a matter in fact all program languages are based off the English language. However, if you want to write your newsletter in Japanese you would most likely have to change your writing style to Japanese in your computer settings its self.

Sure.

I wonder why this has not made it up here yet but here it is anyways:Name: Award SpacePrice: Free (Also have pay services)Server Side Scripting(s)/database(s): PHP/Perl/CGI-BIN/SSI/MySQLSpace: 200MBBandwidth: 5GB /MonthlyAds: NoWeb Address: sub-domainAdditional Comments: They're a really good service with lots to offer and they've been pretty reliable at staying online for the most part (for being a free service and in Beta version). I have yet to try out their tech support. I like that a user can have up to 5 sub-domains for one account, makes managing sub-domains a lot easier. The only con I have is that it only allows 1 FTP connection at a time and it does get annoying, but with all their services at my fingertips I can't really complain that much. I highly suggest this service for anyone looking for a good and reliable host with the cost of nothing.Edit: More comments - I found out they have a filtering system that filters out certain words that would otherwise be considered as a spam site. The worse part about is that they redirect you to a different page without telling you that one of your pages has a filtered word on it. I've recently made a page listing these filtered words: http://oneuse.awardspace.com/word_filter.html

Silence you n00b!!!

css:

.test a {	color:blue;	background-image:url(images/big_button_right.gif); }.test a:hover {color:green;}.test a.l:link { left:  0; background-image: url(images/big_button_left.gif); }.test a.l:hover { left:  0; background-image: url(images/big_button_left.gif); }

html:

<div class="test"><a href="http://www.google.com">hggff</a><div class="l"><a href="http://www.google.com"></a></div></div>