L8V2L

When I read this... it was like I was reading the code that compose together to performance this action... some of them goingvar numb= ["0", 1, "2", 3, "4"];var word = {};var letter = "0";delete(x = 0);function compare(arr, str){var x = 0;for( x in arr[x]){if(x === str){return("true");}else if(x !== str){return("false");}}};compare(numb, letter); But I still want to keep refreshing, so I would love to find new manual that deliver the same information(extra optional) in the same structure of that of a document, manual, guide structure, with a lot of example, but a little different to have something new to read.Anyone seen the new movie of the spin off of the rise of the planet of the ape?!?!?http://youtu.be/hVXYl1URtmYWATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I wasn't going to respond to this, I saw it earlier... I don't know if your joking... I have read three manual on JavaScript, not saying I understand everything... It just... pretend you are me who wrote that post you respond to, and then you came back to read this "Begin by learning how to do basic programming: if, while, for, and function." if(condition){action};[else if, else], for(initial; condition; increment){action};, while(initial; condition;){increment}[do while];, function funcName(parameter0, etc){action};, var varName = function(){};, var varName = function funcName(){}; var varName = new Function(){};, var varName = (function(){})();, var varName = (function(){}()); (function(){})();, (function(){}()); var varName = new Function();I'm not saying I know the stuff, I still want to learn the basic, I still want to read more manual document guides on JavaScript. I want a strong foundation of JavaScript, when I ask question, I need for you to please answer them... it's up to you, but just don't respond with a non answer to my question... again it's up to you. I'm asking of knowledge, don't turn someone away from their question when they are in search for knowledge....you know after writing this I read your begin sentence over again, and now I'm see that you probably mean that, learn the use for which you would use these in basic programming... is that right?PLEASE I NEED MORE I NEED MORE MANUAL DOCUMENT GUIDES ON JAVASCRIPT!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!!Please.

I have read through w3school html, css, and their next level 5 and 3, JavaScript, jquery, then I went back to JavaScript, and read it three time, then I read over mdn three times, and Microsoft guide on JavaScript two time, and advance one time, then I actually found the FREAKING MANUEL and read that. all of this was fundamental and intermediate... NOW I spent most of the day sSTILL SEARCHING FOR BASIC KNOWELDGE TO EXPLAIN TO ME THE BASIC AND IMPORTANT OF JAVASCRIPT!!!!!What are framewares? What are libraries? How are they JavaScript?I would rather work in the javaScript that I been studying and not an implementation of it if that what that is.Thanks for the link justsomeguy.

anyone have any SUGGESTIONS of college? Both campus and online, please thank you!

search past forums that one liked.P.s: SOME ONE CHANGE TO TITLE TO BROWSE BY LIKE, PLEASE!!!

Found it... there isn't anyway to refer to posts that I liked(say the d).

anyone have any suggestions of college? Both campus and online, please thank you!Thanks for the link justsomeguy.

Appreciate the words and links. Please let me rephrase, I understand by the accusations of programming raving about these books... What I mean to say is, I come to like the here it is approach. I'm not saying them books aren't good read, I'm saying I come to love to here it is approach, where their is no talking, their is no joking, just the information, and an explain. I can come to see as those books will contain the author's experience, knowledge, skills, and trick they learn upon the way of their career. I will come around to sitting down, and picking them up to read. But I'm mostly interested in a straight forward book, it can have a little bit of history, and did you know parts in it, but for mostly, I come to love, here it is. Cause with that, with every sentences, I'm gaining knowledge on the subject at hand, not of the author speaking of something which ties in to the we are talking about, but add no real value/knowledge for me to know. I use to think this approach was boarding, but I come to value it, I come to see cause the fact that I want to learn this, I want to not waste time with it, I want to not read long books which a percent of it contain amusement, and laughter(unless it ties directly into the subject to where I'll get knowledge from it).Please note, I have not excuse non of the books you gave me, I just wish to countertrade on memorizing myself with the components of JavaScript, and it's syntax.Thanks for talking the time to reply to my post.

I'm studying the syntax structure basic so I can know the components by heart(Cause I love JavaScript). I'm also looking at other people code...(with little to know understand of them) but starting to recognize some to all the components of the code.That's why I ask you to give me code to read, and then ask what is it doing.

Okay... So like the name imply, stack; if it get stack 1, 2, 3 then it must get un-stack; starting from the last one to be put on the stack. 3, 2, 1. Cause, The interpreter need to un-stack them in order, so it can return back to where it left off at.

;// So a cursive function, is a function that calls it self, as so: function factorial(n) { if ((n == 0) || (n == 1)) return 1 else { var result = (n * factorial(n-1) ); // call it self. return result } }factorial(1);//1factorial(2);//2//Can you give me more example, and explaining?

could you explain to me again of something being copy to a variable and a variable referring to something?

var x = 3;var y = 4;x+= y; // 7y-= x; // -3var z = 0;/*//z-=y;z += x; // 7z-=y; // 3//z += x;*/z-=y;//10// how is this possible?z += x;//10//how is this possible?console.log('x+=y:' + x + 'n' + 'y-=x:' + y + 'r' + 'z -=y:' + z + 'n' + 'z +=x:' + z);/*x+=y:7y-=x:-3z -=y:10z +=x:10*/

A stack is the memory... or reminder for the interpreter to where he left off or and which number, or string, or call back it is on. less than 0. Why do it go back up to three than?I for got to put something in my last message I left. their a saying that I never been told to myself, but what love to do. RTFM or RTFD. Well I WOULD LOVE TO READ THE ######ING MANUEL AND DOCUMENT! JUST GIVE ME THE LINK TO DO SO!

It's not doing anything when I long it in the console.log(loop(0));And I don't want to read another author(look what I know, and spend money and time learning nothing) book. Those book feel like a lot of the tutorial website, just out to waste your time. I want a guide, a guide straight to the point with i.e. every step of the way. I read over w3school three time and mdn guide three time. But I don't feel like I'm advancing. I'm looking at this as a career... I want to make games with this.Do you know any guide books on html, css, javascript; html5? Do you know any guide books for beginner leading toward intermediate, crossing over to advance, and introducing technical. Not where you have a block of words with the author talking about himself, or what he feel or believe. but straight to HERE! THIS IS WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW, AND HERE MORE REFERENCE IF YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE! book.

function foo(i) { if (i < 0) return; document.writeln('begin:' + i); foo(i - 1); document.writeln('end:' + i);}foo(3);begin:3begin:2begin:1begin:0end:0end:1end:2end:3Stack like behavior it said. How it this so? How can it not be negative for the end:?

So that is a recursive function than that call it's self by loop(0);?

can be converted into a recursive function and a call to that function:function loop(x) { if (x >= 10) // "x >= 10" is the exit condition (equivalent to "!(x < 10)") return; // do stuff loop(x + 1); // the recursive call}loop(0);So a recursive function, is a function that can call it self... but every function can do that.Will not every function, you have function that can call them self one time i.e. (function(param0, param1, paramN){}()); or (function(param0, param1, paramN){})(); or they can be attach to a variable i.e. var fun = (function(){})(); or var fun = (function(){}());If some of you don't want to be bother with my question anymore, just give me a link to where I can go and ask them.

This 'assign the parent to FunctionName.prototype.__proto__ instead. For example, WorkerBee.prototype.__proto__ = new Employee; This way, (new WorkerBee).constructor yields expected "WorkerBee".*/'What is it doing? is it the same as WorkerBee.prototype = new Employee?If I can find a book that have less talking and more learning, I want a book that is like w3school or and mdn guide, straight to the point, with picture.DO you know a book like that?

What book!!! I find my self liking documentation, than a amusement from the author. I want to read a documentation with picture.

This 'assign the parent to FunctionName.prototype.__proto__ instead. For example, WorkerBee.prototype.__proto__ = new Employee; This way, (new WorkerBee).constructor yields expected "WorkerBee".*/'And do you know where I should go next? I like you documentation on mdn, it was up front. I say this, w3school and mdn have the best so far, easier to understand. I read both a least three times already. but I... I don't know where to go.. cause of 'read pic' I need to be able to hover over one site, or I'll be every where. Please, do you know where I can go next?

I don't know what to do... any one know where I can go to next, I read the mdn document guide on javascript three times... I just feel like I'm not advancing, I like documentation read; description, and picture show example.

1. function Employee(){2. this.name='';3. this.dept='general';4. }5. Employee;6.7. var Manager = new Employee();8. 9. Manager.reports = [];10. 11. Manager;12.13. function WorkerBee(){14. this.projects = [];15. }16. 17. WorkerBee.prototype = new Employee;18. 19. WorkerBee;/*Note: Directly assigning to FunctionName.prototype removes its original prototype's "constructor" property. As a result, (new WorkerBee).constructor yields "Employee" (instead of expected "WorkerBee"). Care must be taken to preserve the original prototype's constructor. For instance, assign the parent to FunctionName.prototype.__proto__ instead. For example, WorkerBee.prototype.__proto__ = new Employee; This way, (new WorkerBee).constructor yields expected "WorkerBee".*/What's the different between line 7 and 17? And at the bottom, what are they referring to? Speaking of?