Jonas

Then you're an imbecile.

I fail to see the connection. No flaming please.

Apologies, but I believe the reason that topic wasn't pinned (made important, stickied) is that it was expected to hold its own in popularity and stay on the first page. Apparently not. I'll pin it then.For future reference, search is your friend...

For now there's this anyway:http://w3schools.invisionzone.com/index.ph...c=3074&st=0

Try Tools->Appearance->Toolbars. You can enable to show hidden toolbars if necessary. If you can't get it back, you can drag another one onto an existing toolbar from the Buttons tab in the Appearances panel.

Thanks, worked it out.

Well, there's a lot that can be done with Apache SSI, so in that case perhaps a tutorial could be run on running an own server and tweaking it.As for CGI, that really isn't one language. CGI, Common Gateway Interface, isn't a language, but a protocol. To write CGI scripts, you can use many different languages.

Um, okay, so I'm experiencing something weird with Opera. My adress bar disappeared. I mean, I still have the navigation buttons (back, next, update, magic wand) and the search dropdown bar, but the main adress field is gone, and I can't seem to get it back. Anyone able to help? I tried downloading and upgrading Opera (no new version, just installing over the old), and that didn't help either. I really don't want to have to uninstall and install Opera, because I have many icons on my personal toolbar that I don't want to lose. :|

I think his general position is that his browser is a third-generation browser because he says it is, and he doesn't have to follow any standards because no one called him to get his opinion when the standards were being discussed. Also, something about Microsoft, and he's old.

Good summary.

Take my word for it, count on my experience which is more than your age.

That sentence is extremely arrogant, and it reminds me of someone... I'll leave that sentence hanging for those who catch on.

If there is such thing as standard then it should also be seen inside organizations, specially your favourite one (Microsoft).

Whose favourite now?! Where the ###### did you get the impression we like Micro$oft?

What standard did microsoft follow when designing .NET 1 and what made them change their standard for .NET 2, not to mention the C++ language change in each of their version.

Standards for programming languages is a whole nother chapter than structure languages like html. No one here could care less what programming language you use, as long as it outputs correct html and css. It's standards for those languages we're pushing, because that's what matters in a browser*, everything else is for the server to support, and the end-user/client doesn't see that anyway as long as it works and doesn't produce errors. You could make your own language to output html and css, as long as you've also developed a program to parse the code. In fact, that's precisely what Rasmus Lerdorf did in 1994 when he invented what was to be called PHP (originally Personal Home Page Tools, and later, of course, PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor).*Of course other things matter in a browser, like security etc., but strictly speaking for when developing for the net, it's standards for client-side languages that is important.

As far as knowing about standards or infact anything (including programming), I must admit I know very little.

Well, there it is really. If you know little about standards, and admit to it, perhaps you should not start developing a browser, not knowing the basic cornerstones of the net (the languages html and css and the respective standards of them trying to be established by the W3C. You're on a forum of webdesigners/developers/programmers who are pretty much all frustrated by the fact that they have to use extra hours (and, if a job, clients' money) to develop a site that looks the same in all browsers to ensure the end-user (or client, but with another meaning than the last instance of the word) gets the same result no-matter the browser they want to use. That's the WHOLE point of standards, setting a base of rules for what is valid html/css code, and how a browser is supposed to render these things. Even today, Internet Explorer doesn't have support for all of the CSS 2 Spesification, and hardly any support for anything of CSS 3. It's horrible really, and requires coding sites with little "hacks" (work-arounds) and quirks. A forum like this, with people defending and demanding standards die-hard, it may not be the best place to advertize your browser with hope of success.

People who introduce radical changes, normally end up stoned.

I think you may already be stoned.

No pun intended I guess? Or was that all about the double-entendre?

It is not "out of blue", I applied for membership with my correct name, used my registered trade mark to identify myself. I have been allowed to join in this forum after verification of my credentials. Now that I joined this forum with correct identity, what do you expect me to talk about?

Actually, if the only reason you came here was to advertize your browser, you came here for all the wrong reasons. Of course, this is a place to get good constructive criticism, but if you don't care what people tell you and just maintain that your browser is the best anyway, it's just advertizing and border-line spam.

Ok, I'm going to lock this thread, since kaijim has already made a reply to the other thread linked to in Justsomeguy's post (follow the report link).

Wouldn't call it criticism, more a suggestion. Your link on the CSS Valid icon could be changed to http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/refererThat will take the user straight to the validation results.

I notice there's a comment in kaijim's profile as well:http://w3schools.invisionzone.com/index.php?showuser=2Same problem probably... :)Oh, and there was a problem with w3schools last february as well. Took me some time to dig up the thread, but here it is:http://w3schools.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=2386It was IE-only back then as well.I've notified kaijim of this. Thanks for letting us know.

Yes of course, on dial-up connection it will take half of an hour to view a poster size photo of "Cindy Crowford".

Nice example and view into your browsing habits...

Hmm, that's weird. Don't know what would cause that...Anyone else with IE7 experiencing this?

Hmm, so this happens in Firefox, does it? Have you signed in to the forum other places in between your visits here? Because I believe the forum software also does a browser check, so that one cookie session also includes info on the browser. If you've signed in for example at school, with a different version of firefox or perhaps IE then that could account for why your session is ended at home as it were.

Okay...sorrydrop the idea!I just thought that once Microsoft makes SVG complaint stuff it will kinda grow and then there will be more queries. And plus it is a pretty cool XML technology and after lll XSLT has its own forum too!!!!

Well, when it kinda grows we'll see again if the xml forum gets enough SVG threads that a separate forum might be justified. :)On XSLT having its own forum though, that's a bit different, seeing as XSLT is made to manipulate other XML documents. I'm sure boen_robot can tell you more.

Yes it is...but that does not mean we wont have a seperate forum for it?or does it?

Do you feel such a forum is badly needed?

SVG is an xml-based language, is it not?

Lots of recommended hosts here:http://w3schools.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=3770Please continue in that thread.

Is it possible to have a scroll bar in a table cell without using Frames?? Or simply a box compatible with nested tags that has a scroll bar?Primal

If you set the table cell with a fixed width and height, set overflow to auto and make sure the content overflows that fixed height and/or width, then yes. Actually, you won't get a horizontal scrollbar unless you spesifically code your content to stop the automatic linebreak that overflow:auto; does, by using   and such.

You should use overflow:scroll I think

Overflow: scroll; adds a vertical and a horizontal scrollbar, and even if the content doesn't overflow, you still get the inactive scrollbars displayed. I at least much prefer to use auto, so that it only gives you a scrollbar for overflowing content.

You can read through here and see if you find someone. We can't have threads for everyone wondering where people are from, that would amount to a lot of threads very soon, sorry.

Call it whatever you will, it is a space between the two paragraphs. However, the way to affect it with CSS is to set the margin of the p element.

Since P is a block level element it displays as most block elements do: with a line break before and (sometimes) after. try p{display:inline} to get rid of the line break.

It's not to do with the fact that it is a block element, but that it has auto set margins. The point of a paragraph is to stand alone, isn't it? So if you have several paragraphs, they are actually made to look like paragraphs without you having to use line breaks to achieve the wanted margin/space between the paragraphs. To remove the margins, the correct way is to set the margins to be the same in all browsers, using the method jilhaslip did.

Word talked about I'm guessing is ######, but you're not allowed to say that, because it can be put into, well, creative sentences along with other words you're not allowed to say as well...Now, I think this topic has gone on long enough. Now it's gone off-topic from the topic that was already off-topic, so I think we'll say stop here.