Jack McKalling

But all data in it will be lost. There is a valid way of renaming tables though. Like this: ALTER TABLE [i]tablename[/i] RENAME [i]newtablename[/i]

I think that $ just doesn't work :)If this is true, then the object divObj will not be created, so the next line would cause the error, which it does

I know you are not (yet) familiar with them, but at least it is an alternate for when you just want to include some part of a page. Like a banner for all the pages you have, in one external file. Then you won't have to use frames to load all those page parts together Maybe this can be a strive for you to learn those languages, but that's up to you of cource.Frames can do it too, if you use them correctly What exactly went wrong, could you post the code ?

I don't think this increase in spam attractation is significant. There will always be the chance that there will be spammers, even this forum itself causes that. So why not throw a little system in it to increase the thanks coders get

@joecoolaug: side note, the post count is standard at the board :)Just a wild guess, are you from Holland too? I've seen some dutch words somewhere, and the same typos I make (like "of" instead of "or")

At your service

The reason why this happens is quite simple. Every newline in HTML, is interpreted as a space. Next with all other space characters like tab, space, carriage return.If you keep those elements from getting on a new line in the code, then spaces won't come up between them on the page. However, all code on one line is not very readable.Attributes MAY have spacecharacters between them, those are not interpreted at all So if you do it like this: They all would come on one line at the page

Correct, I hope so too. But then again, restrictions could limit the reputations, if restrictions are possible.

You could replace disabled by readonly, and the color would stay the default for when it wasn't readonly

Glad you like the idea :)Hope Kajim likes it too so he would install it

Is that version compatible with our board? And to the mods, is this a good idea?

But they might know where to get such system, and the location where it can be found probably contains an updated one for our version :)Of cource we should only consider compatible versions and free ones too

I think it was a special mod, but specially for IPB at least.I'll have a look again, you can too, here:http://www.dhost.info/forumsI am actually not sure if it is free, but Dhost itself is a free commercial service definately. They host for free, so maybe this mod was too? I'll ask.

I don't know, should, but maybe only by administrator, possibly also moderator :)But I don't have such system, the admin should get one, I don't know sht, lol :)The system I saw was fully customisable thats for sure.

Darn, still I made it working for him, though you already said it

I have seen some Invision Power Boards with reputation systems, and I like it.Couldn't we have one too, to let posters add a special thank to their helpers in the form of a reputation point with comment? It would be nice, its not necessary. But with it we can view the best coders, nicest coders, or best helpers or whatever you name it. Besides, with these special thanks, the helpers on our forum can recieve a bit of extra energy to help even more

Too late, already solved hihi

You're welcome

What aspnetguy said. But using the pseudo-class you mentioned, you have power in controlling the border of that image between the link states. If you remove the border from the image when its link is in "link" state, you could still have a border for the image when link is in "hover" state. I just mean to say, you can remove the border from the image in all link states, just by this css:a img { border:0; }(syntax differes from that of above, but means the same)But you can also define only the removal of the border when in eg hover state, by this:a:hover img { border:0; }Or even only the active and visited but not the hover:a:visited img, a:active img { border:0; }a:hover img { border:solid 2px rgb(150,150,150); }You can make every difference between the states you like. [*Edit:]Remove the colon between the A and IMG elements, it is only needed between an element and a pseudo-class Leaving a space there means every IMG tag inside an A element.

But if you turn to server-side, and don't mind going deeper in programming, eg PHP can load documents in other documents without using frames. Just place content of file two in file one. Like with the include(). Server-side would be more difficult, but it would be the alternate for frames :)Using such thing like include() doesn't require full HTML files at all, even one HTML element is possible to include in a page. Whatever piece you want. Also, javascript that was used at the child document, can now have access to its parent document (and vica versa), using frames you are not allowed to do that.

It is also important to know how much access you yourself have to the website, given from the designer. If you have access to the directory and the files, you can alter the files too. But if you only have access to the websites interface, the pages online I mean, then it depends on if the designer created administrator panels or whatever to enable you to change some content.But maybe this is too difficult to understand.

You can use modules right now :)With it, you can choose a DTD combination, instead of Strict, Transitional or Frameset. The W3C has nice plans with modularisation, I don't know how far they are, but you are allowed and able to use modules now.More about modules at W3S: http://www.w3schools.com/xhtml/xhtml_modules.aspMore about modules at W3C: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml-modularization-20040218/

That is just an ordinary stylesheet to be made :)If a user adjustment is wanted, you can create or look for a skin changer. But you can't ask nor look for a whole stylesheet existing already, it depends on the structure of your pages like aspnetguy says.

A theme is not something real, it is only a trivial name for a real good CSS stylesheet, at least I think. If you mean a theme that has more cousins with different but similar style, then you should look into a skin changer. Eg one skin with some structure style, and various colour definitions for each theme.But to make just one theme for your website, you can either look for an existing or just work hard to create a full stylesheet your own.

You're right, I am not sure with CSS3 in FF. But it at least exists :)I never noticed any CSS2 statement that worked in IE, so I find it rather strange that only some would be supported, why not all? But anyway, using CSS2 in IE is likely to not work (let allone 3)