Jump to content

PrateekSaxena

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    584

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by PrateekSaxena

    Review JS Console

    in General

    Posted

    @justsomeguy : Well the variable does not have any onchange event! So will I have to stick with the Trace or should I put an update button on the Watch section or make it reload every 5 seconds or something like that?

    Review JS Console

    in General

    Posted

    Hey aspnetguy....I wanted to ask one thing!When I do the onerror thing then there is on problem, if let us say I call 4 undefined functions in a row, then it displays only the first one and then stops the script. How can I make it display all the errors??

    Review JS Console

    in General

    Posted

    Hi,So there are certain changes that I have decided to make in the Console, so that it actually becomes a console and not just a Logger. So there are now 6 tabs having Logs, Errors, Watch, HTML, CSS Script. All the log will be in the logs part and will be of two types that is "info" and "log". Errors will be pointed out automatically. I still have to see whether it will be a Watch or a Trace. In the HTML,CSS,Script parts it will be like the HTML,CSS,Script parts of Firebug. I have figured out how to make the thing and I am hard on work! I have attached an image of the new interface, which is a screen shot and not something made on PhotoShop. the console now actually looks like this on the HTML page.Your comments please...post-8609-1173961553_thumb.png

    getStyle('opacity')

    in JavaScript

    Posted

    I was this function in Scriptalicious, I want to know how I too can get and set the opacity of different DIVs through JS so it works in all browsers?EDIT : Delete this post! I found the method, this is the function I wrote :

    function setOpacity(id,opacity) {	var object = document.getElementById(id).style;	object.opacity = (opacity / 100);	object.MozOpacity = (opacity / 100);	object.KhtmlOpacity = (opacity / 100);	object.filter = "alpha(opacity=" + opacity + ")";}

    Review JS Console

    in General

    Posted

    Well, in that case I agree an external application would be a lot better, for the arguments mentioned above, and also because I wouldn't expect to debug a JavaScript by bugging it with more code.
    I did not understand what you just said :)

    Browsing or NotJustBrowsing

    in General

    Posted

    I can't stop laughing long enough to reply...If you have been in this industry so long then where have you been? Locked i n a basement? Why don't you go join a cooking forum or some other group that know nothing about programming or web standards, you might actually convince some of them about your ridiculous claims.
    Hah haha..please aspnetguy, dont talk to Newbies like that or I will have to ban your account and IP :) LOL
    Those are impressive numbers for Opera, I'm happy to see that. I've been pushing Opera for a while. It is very impressive to look at the 3-year traffic graph for opera.com, people really took notice when Opera 8 and 9 were released. I'm fairly suprised that the traffic is higher then for Firefox, but I bet that if you added up all of the different Firefox sites (getfirefox.com, mozilla.com/products/firefox etc) I bet the number would favor Firefox over Opera at that point.
    Yup, I just took that stats of the one with the highest, if we add up then FF will be better!

    x.grandpa.nodeValue

    in JavaScript

    Posted

    Okay!eat: function(){alert(this.name + " is eating!")}This is the part that I was never able to understand!Apart from a website, is there a book that I should refer too, I mean a real book with paper and stuff!

×
×
  • Create New...