Jonas

Heh, that's great. Warnings validate you know, they're not errors. Still, if you need further help, that's cool. I'm signing off now though, because it's 2:11 AM here... *yawn*

Like I said, try lengths instead of simply numbers.

Ah, I see. That wouldn't be so difficult to make, just the opposite of the color tag.

You really should be able to simply use numbers according to the CSS 2 spesification. Try using a length instead:http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visudet.html...def-line-heightOh, and I hope you noticed I edited the previous post:http://w3schools.invisionzone.com/index.ph...ost&p=49247

<link removed.>^ That's the link....Wait, you're browsing with IE, right? I just tried the link in IE, and I notice it doesn't work. I believe IE has a character limit on the adress field. In Opera, the link opens fine. Firefox too, although Opera loads a lot quicker. :|Hmm, try this then:main.css

What? You still got the same error? Are you sure you uploaded the updated css document to test? I tried it, and the error went away...Check out this link. That's a link to the validation of your css file with all the code. At the bottom of the page you get there's the valid css, and body is valid.

No problem, glad to be of help. It's why I'm here.

The html code for that would be<span style="text-decoration: overline underline;">Text to be overlined and underlined.</span>

You should keep the quotes when declaring a group of fonts, the quotes are not the problem.

The problem with the body css not validating is that you've declared measuring units like thismargin-left: 0px;while if you have no margin (also goes for padding) you're not supposed to write "px", "pt", "em" or whatever. Remove the px's and it should be valid. Then it's the cursor, where "hand" is not a valid cursor. You probably want the "pointer", right? http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/ui.html#propdef-cursor "Whitesmoke" is not a valid background, do a Ctrl+B in notepad to find the place where this is used and replace it with a valid background attribute/color.http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/colors.html#q2 A color-name can not be a value on text-decoration, it's either overline, underline, linethrough, blink or none.http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/text.html#li...-striking-props line-height: ; needs a value.http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visudet.html...def-line-height

You don't need a highlight tag when there are tags.

What?

Python can be used for many things, not just CGI exclusively. But I know it can be used for CGI, we coded in Python in our programming classes, just to get a look into some other programming languages (php was also a language we looked at, the main language was VB, which I consider a total waste).Here some info on using Python for CGI:http://wiki.python.org/moin/CgiScripts

You can also follow this link:http://www.w3schools.com/about/about_helping.aspand follow the instructions there on helping correct errors.

Isn't CGI mostly outdated though, and the same things can be done as fast or faster with PHP or ASP.Net?

Probably just basing it on Justsomeguy's postcount.

Hmm, I like that idea. Just give me a year and 5 days to turn 20, so I can use it in Norway. :)Choco has some turning-21 to do for that prize to be any good.

Now you're moving onto this discussion:http://w3schools.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=5790

http://www.wsabstract.com/howto/htaccess9.shtml AddType application/x-shockwave-flash swf tells the server to send files with swf extension with the MIME type application/x-shockwave-flash. Similarly, writing AddType application/x-httpd-php .html should tell the server to send files with html extension as PHP files, and so be sent to the PHP parser. It's possible though that it should be x-httpd-php html without the . (dot) infront of html. When I first googled (yes, it's that simple) for ".htaccess" and "parsing html files for php", I found an example with the dot in front of html: http://www.bigbold.com/snippets/posts/show/459Apologies.

It was really uttered as a remark, although I was expecting that it was against the rules, but I realize that was in an older version. I still think it's a bad idea to discuss things like politics and religion and stuff unless we have an off-topic forum where people can knowingly engage in such debates, because discussions/debates on politics and religion often develop into arguments. But never mind.

Yup, that should work. Granted php is installed on your server of course.

I don't spend much time thinking about (precisely) how old the earth is either, but I take it for granted that it is at least 500 million years like they say here, and not 6 or 12,000 years. That's really the discussion I believe. This has really evolved into a religious debate, whether you believe this or that.

No problem. Good luck.

I think it's really a matter of discretion. There's a fine line with what's copyright infringement and what's not on the internet, as nobody can really claim copyright on any code itself. So if you were to write your own tutorials (worded as it would fall natural for you to word it), it probably wouldn't be an infringement.However, the best idea is for you to base your tutorials on is what you know of html (or whatever tutorial it is). I would not use w3schools.com as a basis, then translate and further try to write it differently, that way it's still guaranteed to bear too much similarity to the original content.Instead start writing and explaining it on the language you want (Italian, in this case) the way you feel it best explained. There are lots of tutorials on weblanguages out there, and the really big sites offer similar services and yet manage to refrain from copying each others' content. If you're already writing your own tutorials it's really not difficult finding similar examples like the try-it examples, only with different wording.

Just because they offer a service for free doesn't mean it's not subject to copyright. They created the content, and as such have the right to decide who posts it and where it is posted. So kaijim says that if they want content translated, they will look for people to do it, and it will probably still be hosted on the same site.You have to understand that w3schools.com is supported by advertizing royalties, and so if the same content is offered on other sites, that would be really bad, because w3schools.com might lose the advertizers, further losing money, which again would mean either that they would have to stop developing content and maybe take the site down because of the bandwidth costs, or that the server costs/working hours would have to be covered by someone else, the users of the site. If you like w3schools.com as a free service, respecting that copyright is what needs to be done for it to stay that way.The above is not an official w3schools.com opinion, just my take on the matter. Thanks for understanding.