Jump to content

Jack McKalling

Members
  • Posts

    1,606
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jack McKalling

  1. NextI think many people would like it when all <A> elements at this forum would have contrasting colors, right now it does not differ to the text we post
  2. Also have a look at the "Web Services" forum for my topic about Dhost.info
  3. You can use it to edit files in your directory, to create files, to read files, to use, read and write server variables, and for the handling with databases
  4. Internet Explorer Well, I do, and I have the same problem as F-man here
  5. I think I know what's wrong. The nav links practically have the same HREF, besides, in your CSS there does is a color definition of element "a", only "none" specified.You might remove the color property of a-element completely, and give the anchors theirself each their own link. Even the targets do not exist yet, just for testing :)For the rest, the code seems to be valid and correctly implemented as far as I can see. I haven't tested it yet by myself though, I may do that later.
  6. No, you got that wrong. Theres only need for ONE colorNavs() per document! Because the loop colours everything.What I meant, is that there should be one for every document that has that navigation. Example:Homepage.html >> colorNavs(1, 4)MyForums.html >> colorNavs(2, 4)Paintings.html >> colorNavs(3, 4)Galery.html >> colorNavs(4, 4)It looks like what you say, many lines in the footer, but that is not true It is only ONE per file Else there would be no need for a looping, would there In fact, the function has a plural name.Why I do NOT recommend your way:When she uses your code, she can only save her files with a special number as a name, which is not common and bad in use. Filenames should be named discribingly, unlike with numbers. My code is filename-independant anyway :)But I don't like this, being a bit annoyed, shall we be friends again?
  7. My sollution would work too, wouldn't it :)With what I wrote above, you should manually define the current page for every document, that should be coloured differently, but it does work so that only one of the navs is coloured differently.With Blue's code you have to write more to colour the currentpage nav, and for other pages you have to write it again, you only have to write When there are five nav elements and the current is one, with my code.And you won't want to write this over and over again:
  8. This looks awfull You should do it like this inside your stylesheet: And then this: --------Second, you might write a loop for the adjusting to the nav's, instead of writing everyone after one another This could be the total scriptfile: Then, just before </body> at the html-document, insert this script: Don't forget to edit the coloured.And all your navigation elements you want to color should have an ID specified, but ALL like id="Nav1". The number is 1 for the first nav, 2 for the second etc...So: when you have done all this, you should only have to edit the blue line above at every document with this navigation, to the number that page represents
  9. Jack McKalling

    Tables

    THAT, is because you use HTML :)Xhtml is a recommend for that
  10. No bradley.lee, you haven't read my explanation.window.open() is not what I want, window.createPopup() is.
  11. Jack McKalling

    Tables

    Nonsens, tables are not only for tabular data. How could you ever think that? :DTables are good for putting blocklevel data next to eachother :yes:It can be done with stylesheets, but then ALL can be done like that! Using a table for querying blocklevel data on a line, still is structuring your document, which does not have to be done by CSS, that is only its style :)But we could have an endless discusion here, so we should leave it as is You are right, I'm right
  12. Actually, I try to avoid using .getElementsByTagName() and .all while they both are not w3c standard, .all because div layers are even only supported by netscape or some.Ahwell, I don't care about them being not standard. If I have to use them, I do, else, I'll think of something more usable.
  13. IE only yes;)It would be nice if my site will be cross browser, but that is hard since I'm planning to do many things..
  14. Jack McKalling

    Tables

    And add </html> at the bottom
  15. Jack McKalling

    password

    Are you asking for a login system? :)And also a member log?
  16. I agree, but I haven't got Flash programms, so I can't test it myself.darn
  17. As for a guestbook, it will need more than only Html :)It might use: Html Css JavaScript PHP or CGI
  18. No, javascript wouldn't work at all, according to my friend who makes it for me ...
  19. Like that, indeed.The javascript I want to use is like this: java script:ChangeCol("MoviesCol","FunCol","center_column")And for the second area:java script:ChangeCol("FunCol","MoviesCol","left_column")I am not sure this was the correct script, as somebody else wrote it for me, and I may have forgotten it a bit.
  20. Example:I want p=window.createPopup() and below it p.document.src="", so I can load a document in it instead of writing it right in this one. This comes in handy when I plan to use it as a Tooltip (like the attribute title="") on hovering one element, or clicking a button (like to show some help info).It also comes in handy when I want to activate the curent window and terminate the popup at the same time, by clicking in the window or popup. This is not possible when I use window.open() or the modelessdialogbox / modaldialogbox.
  21. .data? :DThat is just another new thing for me...Could someone please phonecall Refsness so they add all this to the tutorial? :)My head burns with al those newbees and I am getting burned up by questions about them all (It is that I do like to get answered at the forums, but more like to read the answer at the tut so I and many other people can learn it advancedly )I can't find anything about these things at the Html DOM tut, why not?Why are childNodes[] not a W3C standard?
  22. I don't know any "focus" pseudo thing?It may be a browser issue, why it works with yours, but that it is not a W3C standard and not listed
  23. This is possible, am I right?Not difficult at all, just place the Content cell and the gray thing in one table, the gray cell with height:100% and that table just as you want it to.I would be glad to code it for you, if you could just give me your current version
  24. No, not correct. Tables may be used with and by anything you like. And what you want with this table inside a table can and may be done in Xhtml, but different to what you learned at Html lessons.One cell can be filled in a container cell, but there is no such thing as one cell without a table to support it. So the cell that you want to fill inside somewhere, must be inside another table. You wrote in Html the sollution, and that would work. But in Xhtml, it must be defined as styles, which, inline, are not inherited. So every parent of the filling cell untill the cell it should be in must get a height specification to 100%.It does not matter if the containing cell is 100px or also 100% of its own parent.
  25. Else there can be no feedback, no input by the visitors, can there? :)It would only contain information and no communication. This was a good idea, so it should get a link inside the banner somehow, or a navigation next to the banner's location
×
×
  • Create New...